Factors Influencing Water Consumption in the Kingdom of Bahrain and Environmental Consequences of Bottled Water Consumption
Keywords:
Bottled, drinking, environmental, consequences, waterAbstract
Background. The drinking of bottled water has remarkably increased at a global scale even in the regions possessing other adequate water sources. This study elaborates on the factors influencing the consumption of tap, filtered, and bottled water in the Kingdom of Bahrain and on the environmental consequences of bottled water consumption.
Methods. A cross-sectional study was performed on 483 participants in the Kingdom of Bahrain between April and May 2019. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted to assess the preferred water type, to estimate the amount of bottled water consumption per year/capita, and other water consumption-related information.
Results. The study revealed that filtered (35.90%) and bottled (34.50%) waters were predominantly consumed in the Kingdom, while the consumption of tap water was negligible (8.90%). The total consumption of bottled water was 0.51 liters/day, which is equivalent to 184.69 liters/year. Thus, 295.50 liters/capita/year of bottled water were consumed based on the approximate 1.6 million population in 2019. This consumption rate is extremely high in comparison to other countries.
Conclusions. The study recommended improving population satisfaction of tap water, conducting tap water marketing campaigns, investments in recycling infrastructures, and introducing educational plans to properly dispose of water bottles.
References
1. Hobson WL, Knochel ML, Byington CL, Young PC, Hoff CJ, Buchi KF. Bottled, filtered, and tap water use in Latino and non-Latino children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 May; 161(5): 457-61. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.5.457.
2. Díez J, Antigüedad I, Agirre E, Rico A. Perceptions and consumption of bottled water at the University of the Basque Country: showcasing tap water as the real alternative towards a water-sustainable University. Sustainability. 2018; 10(10): 3431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su10103431.
3. Central Informatics Organization. Bahrain Open Data Portal. Data.gov.bh. 2016. Available on: http://www.data.gov.bh/ [Last accessed: 2022 Mar 1].
4. Zafar S. Solid Waste Management in Bahrain. Waste Management Outlook for the Middle East. In: Brinkmann R, Garren SJ, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Sustainability. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018: 159-81. doi: 10.1007/978-3319-71389-2_9.
5. Bahrain: Bottled Water Market and the Impact of COVID-19 on It in the Medium. Available on: https://www.marketresearch.com/WilliamsMarshall-Strategy-v4196/Bahrain-Bottled-Water-Impact-COVID-13618393/ [Last accessed: 2022 Mar 1].
6. Freije AM, Sayeed SM, Naser HA. Mineral compositions of tap, filtered and bottled waters in Bahrain. Int J Recent Engin Technol. 2019 May; 8(1C2): 571-7.
7. Tolba M, Saab N. Arab Environment Future Challenges. Arab Forum for Environment and Development. 2008: 111-26.
8. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Municipal Solid Waste. 2014. Available on: http:// www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/municipal/> [Last accessed: 2022 Mar 1].
9. Zafar S. Solid Waste Management in Bahrain. EcoMENA. 2014 August. Available on:
http://www.ecomena.org/solid-waste-bahrain/ [Last accessed: 2022 Mar 1].
10. Freije AM, Ali HA, Al Ansari M, Ali ME. Public awareness and willingness for recycling in the Kingdom of Bahrain: factors influencing households’ participation. Arab Gulf J Sci Res. 2015; 33(4): 138-56.
11. Al-Rashid M, Sherif M. Water resources in the GCC countries: an overview. Water Resour Manag. 2000; 14: 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1023/ A:1008127027743.
12. Johnson BB. Do reports on drinking water quality affect customers’ concerns? Experiments in report content. Risk Anal. 2003; 23(5): 985-98. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00375.
13. Karnani A. The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid. Calif Manage Rev. 2007; 49(4): 90-111. doi: 10.2307/41166407.
14. Keramati H, Mahvi AH, Abdulnezhad L. The survey of physical and chemical quality of Gonabad drinking water in spring and summer of 1386. Horizon Med Sci. 2007; 13(3): 25-32.
15. Doria MF. Factors influencing public perception of drinking water quality. Water Policy. 2010; 12: 1-19. doi:10.2166/ep.2009.051.
16. Dupont D, Adamowicz WL, Krupnick A. Differences in water consumption choices in Canada: The role of socio-demographics, experiences, and perceptions of health risks. J Water Health. 2010; 8(4): 671-86. doi: 10.2166/ wh.2010.143.
17. Using seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) desalting system for less environmental impacts in Qatar. Desalination. 2013; 68: 600-5.
18. Loloei M, Zolala F. Survey on the quality of mineral bottled waters in Kerman city in 2009. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2011; 10(3): 183-92.
19. Rodwan JG. Bottled water 2015-acceleration. US and international developments and statistics. Bottled Water Reporter. 2016 Jul/Aug. Available on: http://www.bottledwater.org/ [Last accessed: 2022 Mar 1].
20. Bottled Water Market. (Product Type—Still Bottle Water, Carbonated Bottle Water, Flavored Bottle Water, and Functional Bottle Water; Packaging—PET Bottles and Glass Bottles; Distribution Channel—Super/Hypermarket, Convenience/Drug Stores, Grocery Stores/Club Stores, and Foodservice/Vending)—Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast 2017–2024. 2017. Available on: http://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/ bottled-water-market.html [Last accessed: 2022 Mar 1].
21. Wilk R. 2006 Bottled Water, the Pure Commodity in the Age of Branding. J Consumer Culture. 2006; 6(3): 303-25. doi: 10.1177/1469540506068681.
22. Massoud MA, Maroun R, Abdelnabi H, Jamali II, El-Fadel M. Public perception and economic implications of bottled water consumption in underprivileged urban areas. Environ Monit Assess. 2013 Apr; 185(4): 3093-102. doi: 10.1007/ s10661-012-2775-x.
23. Wright CJ, Sargeant JM, Edge VL, et al; RICG; IHACC Research Team, Harper SL. How are perceptions associated with water consumption in Canadian Inuit? A cross-sectional survey in Rigolet, Labrador. Sci Total Environ.
2018 Mar 15; 618: 369-78. doi: 10.1016/j.
scitotenv.2017.10.255. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
24. Delpla I, Legay C, Proulx F, Rodriguez MJ. Perception of tap water quality: Assessment of the factors modifying the links between satisfaction and water consumption behavior. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun; 20: 722:137786. doi: 10.1016/j.
scitotenv.2020.137786. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
25. Gambino I, Bagordo F, Coluccia B, et al. PETBottled Water Consumption in View of a Circular Economy: The Case Study of Salento (South Italy). Sustainability. 2020 Sept; 12(19): 7988. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197988.
26. Geerts R, Vandermoere F, Winckel TV, et al. Bottle or tap? Toward an integrated approach to water type consumption. Water Res.
2020 Apr 15; 173: 115578. doi: 10.1016/j.
watres.2020.115578. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
27. Aslani H, Pashmtab P, Shaghaghi A, Mohammadpoorasl A, Taghipour A, Zarei M. Tendencies towards bottled drinking water consumption: Challenges ahead of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste management. Health Promot Perspect. 2021 Feb; 11(1): 60-8. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.09.
28. Ballantine PW, Ozanne LK, Bayfield R. Why buy free? Exploring perceptions of bottled water consumption and its environmental consequences.
Sustainability. 2019; 11(3): 757. https://doi. org/10.3390/su11030757.
29. Chen H, Zhang Y, Ma L, et al. Change of water consumption and its potential influential factors in Shanghai: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2012 June; 12: 450. doi:
10.1186/1471-2458-12-450.
30. Villanueva CM, Garfí M, Milà C, Olmos S, Ferrer I, Tonne C. Health and environmental impacts of drinking water choices in Barcelona, Spain:
A modelling study. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 15; 795: 148884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2021.148884.
31. A Million Bottles a Minute: World’s Plastic Binge as Dangerous as ‘Climate Change. 2017. Available on: https://www.theguardian.com/ environment/2017/jun/28/a-million-a-minuteworlds-plastic-bottle-binge-as-dangerous-asclimate-change [Last accessed: 2022 Mar 1].
32. Shomar B, Hawari J. Desalinated drinking water in the GCC countries- The need to address consumer perceptions. Environ Res. 2017 Oct; 158: 203-11. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
33. Ogonowski M, Gerdes Z, Gorokhova E. What we know and what we think we know about microplastic effects – A critical perspective. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health. 2018 Feb; 1: 41-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2017.09.001.
34. Etale A, Jobin M, Siegrist M. Tap versus bottled water consumption: The influence of social norms, affect and image on consumer choice. Appetite. 2018 Feb 1; 121: 138-46. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.090. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
35. Fischer EK, Paglialonga L, Czech E, Tamminga M. Microplastic pollution in lakes and lake shoreline sediments - A case study on Lake Bolsena and Lake Chiusi (central Italy). Environ Pollut. 2016 Jun; 213: 648-57. doi: 10.1016/j.
envpol.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
36. Talatala S. The effect of tap water perception on the consumption of bottled water. 2008. [Online document], May 12 2008. Available on: https://nature.berkeley.edu/classes/es196/ projects/2008final/Talatala_2008.pdf [Last accessed: 2022 Mar 1].
37. Ferrier C. Bottled water: understanding a social phenomenon. AMBIO J Hum Environ Stud. 2001 Mar; 30(2): 118-9. doi: 10.1579/00447447-30.2.118.
38. Doria MF. Bottled water versus tap water: understanding consumers’ preferences. J Water Health. 2006 Jun; 4(2): 271-6.
39. Espinosa-García AC, Díaz-Ávalos C, GonzálezVillarreal FJ, Val-Segura R, Malvaez-Orozco V, Mazari-Hiriart M. Drinking water quality in a Mexico city university community: perception and preferences. Ecohealth. 2015 Mar; 12(1): 88-97. doi: 10.1007/s10393-014-0978-z. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
40. Tosun J, Scherer U, Schaub S, Harald Horn
H. Making Europe go from bottles to the tap: Political and societal attempts to induce behavioral change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water. 2020 Mar; 7(3): e1435. https://doi.org/10.1002/ wat2.1435.
41. Brede C, Fjeldal P, Skjevrak I, Herikstad H. Increased migration levels of bisphenol A from polycarbonate baby bottles after dishwashing, boiling and brushing. Food Addit Contam. 2003 Jul; 20(7): 684-9. doi: 10.1080/0265203031000119061.
42. Shotyk W, Krachler M, Chen B. Contamination of Canadian and European bottled waters with antimony from PET containers. J Environ Monit. 2006 Feb; 8(2): 288-92. doi: 10.1039/b517844b. Epub 2006 Jan 20.
43. Gleick PH, Cooley HS. Energy implications of bottled water. Environ. Res. Lett. 2009; 4(1): 014009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326 /4/1/014009.
44. Parag Y, Roberts JTA. Battle against the Bottles: Building, Claiming, and Regaining Tap-Water Trustworthiness. Soc Nat Resour. 2009; 22(7): 625-36. https://doi. org/10.1080/08941920802017248.
45. Van der Linden S. Exploring Beliefs about Bottled Water and Intentions to Reduce Consumption: The Dual-Effect of Social Norm Activation and Persuasive Information. Environ Behav. 2015; 47: 526-50. https://doi. org/10.1177/0013916513515239.
46. European Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Quality of Water Intended for Human Consumption (Recast). COM/2017/0753 Final—2017/0332 (COD). 2017. Available on: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ TXT/?uri=CELEX:52017PC0753. [Last accessed: 2022 Mar 1].
47. Montenegro P, Rodriguez M, Miranda L, Joerin F, Proulx F. Occurrence of citizen complaints concerning drinking water: a case study in Quebec City. J Water Supply. 2009; 58(4): 257-66.
48. Giacosa E, Giovando G. Bottled water consumption: the case of Italy. World J Soc Sci Res. 2012; 2: 200-17.
49. Queiroz JTM, Doria MF, Rosenberg M, Heller LH, Zhouri A. Perceptions of bottled water consumers in three Brazilian municipalities. J Water Health. 2013 Sep; 11(3): 520-31. doi: 10.2166/ wh.2013.222
50. Diduch M, Polkowska, Namie˂nik J. Factors affecting the quality of bottled water. Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol J. 2013 Mar; 23(2): 111-9.
doi: 10.1038/jes.2012.101. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
51. Wright S, Thompson RC, Galloway TS. The physical impacts of microplastics on marine organisms: a review. Environ Pollut. 2013 Jul; 178: 483-92. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.02.031. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
52. Ragusa AT, Crampton A. To buy or not to buy? Perceptions of bottled drinking water in Australia and New Zealand. Hum Ecol. 2016 Oct; 44(5): 565-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745016-9845-6.
53. Hobson WL, Knochel ML, Byington CL, Young PC, Hoff CJ, Buchi KF. Bottled, filtered, and tap water use in Latino and non-Latino children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 May; 161(5): 457-61. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.5.457.
54. Yao Z. Factors influencing bottled water drinking behavior. 2011. Available on: https://courses. cit.cornell.edu/dea150/files/2011%20files/ Project%203.pdf [Last accessed: 2022 Mar 1].
55. Lindell M, Whitney D. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol. 2001 Feb; 86(1): 114-21. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114.
56. Maraqa A, Ghoudi K. Survey of public attitude towards bottled and tap water quality in the UAE. Global Nest J. 2015; 17(3): 607-17.
57. Choate B, Davis BY, Verrecchia J. Campus bottled water bans, not always the solution. Int J Sustain High Educ 2018; 19(5): 987-97. doi:
10.1108/IJSHE-06-2017-0089.
58. Makos L. What’s wrong with the tap? Examining perceptions of tap and bottled water at Western Michigan University. Honors Theses. 2018; 3023. Available on: https://scholarworks.wmich. edu/honors_theses/3023 [Last accessed: 2022 Mar 1].
59. Qian N. Bottled water or tap water? A comparative study of drinking water choices on University campuses. Water. 2018; 10(1): 59. https://doi.
org/10.3390/w10010059.
60. Sajjadi S, Alipour V, Matlabi M, Biglari H. Consumer perception and preference of drinking water. Electron Physician 2016 Nov 25; 8(11): 3228-33. doi: 10.19082/3228.
61. Kanat G. Risk Perception and Bottled Drinking Water Consumption in Istanbul City. Global Nest J. 2017; 19(3): 521-32.
62. Victory KR. Risk perception, drinking water source and quality in a low-income Latino community along the US-Mexico border. Electronic Dissertation. University of Arizona; 2014.
63. Doria MF, Pidgeon N, Hunter PR. Perception of tap water risks and quality: a structural equation model approach. Water Sci Technol. 2005; 52(8): 143-9.
64. European Opinion Research Group (EORG). The attitudes of European towards the environment. Eurobarometer 58.0. Brussels; 2002.
65. Walls J, Pidgeon N, Weyman A, Horlick-Jones T. Critical trust: understanding lay perceptions of health and safety risk regulation. Health Risk Soc. 2004; 6(2): 133-50. https://doi.org/10.1080 /1369857042000219788.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.