Epidemiological Study of Functional Dry Eye Disease in Working-class Population in Shanghai, China
Main Article Content
Keywords
Functional dry eye disease, questionnaire, risk factor, contact lens, deep sleep
Abstract
Background: To investigate the current status, morbidity, and risk factors of functional dry eye disease (DED) in Shanghai's working-class population and explore measures to fundamentally cure and prevent functional DED. Methods: A questionnaire form was used to record the data of the diagnosed functional DED working-class subjects in Shanghai, the results were recorded and analyzed. Additionally, the subjective symptoms of DED subjects and the respective clinical results were also recorded. The classification and corneal staining between subjects who wear contact lens or without were compared. The correlation of classification and corneal staining with their risk factors were also analyzed. Results: The risk factors of functional DED showed much in common though their works have professional particularity. Evaporative dry eye (EDE) accounts for a large proportion of DED (45.35%), many subjects co-exist symptoms and signs of mixed DED (32.64%). The age of 21-40 is the peak year range (70.4%). Contact lens, visual terminals, air-conditioner, decoration, stay up later, sleep disorder, smoking were risk factors in most functional DED subjects. Notably, contact lens is a leading risk factor to cause functional DED and ocular surface complications (both were p<0.01), while deep sleep seems to be a protective factor (p<0.01%). Conclusion: The incidence of functional DED in Shanghai is kept in a high level. Most risk factors are closely related to daily work and life, while they are almost reversible. Exploring and eradicating these daily risk factors seems to be a more preferable way to fundamentally control and prevent functional DED.
References
2. McCann P, Abraham AG, Mukhopadhyay A, et al. Prevalence and Incidence of Dry Eye and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022; 140(12):1181-1192. Doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol. 2022.4394
3. Liu NN, Liu L, Li J, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye symptom in mainland china: a system-atic review and meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol. 2014; 2014:748654. Doi: 10.1155/2014/ 748654
4. Lienert JP, Tarko L, Uchino M, et al. Long-term Natural History of Dry Eye Disease from the Patient's Perspective. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(2):425-433. Doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha. 2015.10. 011
5. Bron AJ, Dogru M, Horwath-Winter J, et al. Reflections on the Ocular Surface: Summary of the Presenta-tions at the 4th Coronis Foundation Ophthalmic Symposium Debate: "A Multifactorial Approach to Ocu-lar Surface Disorders" (August 31 2021). Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2022;27(5):142. Doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2705142
6. Liang LY, Li J, Liu ZG. Focusing on the functional dry eye. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2019; 55(12):885-890. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2019.12.003
7. Liu zg. Chinese expert consensus on dry eye: lifestyle-related dry eye (2022). Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi.2022;58(8):573-583. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20220509-00236
8. Jones L, Efron N, Bandamwar K, et al. TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of contact lenses on the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. 2023; 29:175-219. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04.010
9. Stapleton F, Abad JC, Barabino S, et al. TFOS lifestyle: Impact of societal challenges on the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. 2023 Apr;28:165-199. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04.006
10. Wolffsohn JS, Lingham G, Downie LE, te al. TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of the digital environment on the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. 2023; 28:213-252. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04. 004
11. Alves M, Asbell P, Dogru M, et al. TFOS Lifestyle Report: Impact of environmental conditions on the ocu-lar surface. Ocul Surf. 2023; 29:1-52. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04.007
12. Auffret É, Gomart G, Bourcier T, et al. Digital eye strain. Symptoms, prevalence, pathophysiology, and management]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021; 44(10):1605-1610. doi: 10.1016/ j.jfo.2020.10.002
13. Bazeer S, Jansonius N, Snieder H, et al. The relationship between occupation and dry eye. Ocul Surf. 2019;17(3):484-490. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2019.04.004
14. Van Tilborg MM, Murphy PJ, Evans KS. Impact of dry eye symptoms and daily activities in a modern of-fice. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94(6):688-693. Doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001086
15. McMonnies CW. Eye rubbing type and prevalence including contact lens 'removal-relief' rubbing. Clin Exp Optom. 2016; 99(4):366-372. Doi: 10.1111/cxo.12343
16. Dogan AS, Gurdal C, Arslan N. Corneal confocal microscopy and dry eye findings in contac lens discom-fort patients. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41(1):101-104. Doi: 10.1016/j.clae. 2017.08.001
17. Osae EA, Jones L, Nichols JJ. The impact of contact lenses on meibomian gland morphology. Ocul Surf. 2022; 24:148-155. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2022.04.001.
18. Li W, Sun X, Wang Z, et al. A survey of contact lens-related complications in a tertiary hospital in China. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41(2):201-204. Doi: 10.1016/j.clae. 2017.10.007
19. Guillon M, Dumbleton KA, Theodoratos P, et al. Association between contact lens discomfort and pre-lens tear film kinetics. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(8):881-891. Doi: 10.1097/OPX. 0000000000000866
20. Hall, A. J. Some observations on the acts of closing and opening the eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1936; 20(5):257-295. Doi: 10.1136/bjo.20.5.257
21. Yu X, Guo H, Liu X, et al. Dry eye and sleep quality: a large community-based study in Hangzhou. Sleep. 2019;42(11):zsz160. Doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsz160
22. Ayaki M, Tsubota K, Kawashima M, et al. Sleep Disorders are a Prevalent and Serious Comorbidity in Dry Eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(14): DES143-150. Doi: 10.1167/ iovs.17-23467
23. Li S, Ning K, Zhou J, et al. Sleep deprivation disrupts the lacrimal system and induces dry eye disease. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50(3):e451. Doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.285
24. Li S, Tang L, Zhou J, et al. Sleep deprivation induces corneal epithelial progenitor cell over-expansion through disruption of redox homeostasis in the tear film. Stem Cell Reports. 2022. 10;17(6):1105-1119. Doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.05.007
25. Gipson IK, Argueso P. Role of mucins in the function of the corneal and conjunctival epithelia. Int Rev Cy-tol. 2013;231:1–49. Doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(03)31001-0
26. Jester JV, Potma E, Brown DJ. PPARγ Regulates Mouse Meibocyte Differentiation and Lipid Synthesis. Oc-ul Surf. 2016;14(4):484-494. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2016.08.001
27. Tang L, Wang X, Wu J, et al. Sleep deprivation induces dry eye through inhibition of PPARα expression in corneal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(13): 5494-5508. Doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24504
