Posture Assessment of Rubber Tappers: A Comparative Analysis of OWAS, REBA, RULA, and PERA Methods
Main Article Content
Keywords
Agriculture, Ergonomics, Musculoskeletal disorders, Observational method
Abstract
Background: The study provides a comprehensive ergonomics assessment of the postures encountered by rubber tappers using the OWAS, REBA, RULA, and PERA methods and compares the risk levels across various ergonomic assessment methodologies. Methods: The research examines the postures of fifty-one selected rubber tappers from the state of Kerala, India, during rubber tapping, analyzing 1111 different working postures. The postural assessment was conducted by analyzing video recordings of the work tasks and evaluating the postures using OWAS, REBA, RULA, and PERA. Each method's focus and application were considered to comprehensively evaluate the postural risks. Results: The demographic characteristics indicate that the workforce mostly consists of middle-aged males involved in physically strenuous activities. The result shows that the RULA method, emphasizing upper limb postures, is particularly suited for assessing postural loads in rubber tapping, highlighting the need to match ergonomic tools to the specific demands of work activities. While OWAS provides a general overview, RULA focuses on upper limbs, REBA assesses whole-body postures, and PERA incorporates cyclic work factors, enabling targeted ergonomic interventions. Additionally, it is crucial to consider that each method OWAS, RULA, REBA, and PERA has distinct strengths and applications. Conclusions: The research highlights the need for tailored ergonomic interventions for tasks such as 'Incision on the Channel'. Ultimately, the study validates implementing a context-specific approach for assessing ergonomic parameters and intervention measures aimed at enhancing the overall occupational health of rubber tappers.
References
2. Ali H, Davies DR. The effects of age, sex and tenure on the job performance of rubber tappers. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2003;76(3):381-91.
3. Odjugo AP, Ikhile CI. The impact of climatic conditions and tapping time on the yield of rubber (Hevea braziliensis) in mid-western Nigeria. Trop Agric. 2004; 81(1):7-10.
4. Meksawi S, Tangtrakulwanich B, Chongsuvivatwong V. Musculoskeletal problems and ergonomic risk assessment in rubber tappers: A community-based study in southern Thailand. Int J Ind Ergon. 2012;42(1):129-35.
5. Aarås A, Westgaard RH, Stranden E. Postural angle as an indicator of postural load and muscular in-jury in occupational work situations. Ergonomics. 1988;31(6):915-933.
6. Genaidy AM, Karwowski W. The effects of neutral posture deviations on perceived joint discomfort ratings in sitting and standing postures. Ergonomics. 1993;36(7):785-792.
7. Keyserling WM, Punnett L, Fine LJ. Trunk posture and back pain: identification and control of occupa-tional risk factors. Appl Ind Hyg. 1988;3(3):87-92.
8. David GC. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskel-etal disorders. Occup Med (Lond). 2005;55(3):190-199.
9. Dane D, Feuerstein M, Huang GD, Dimberg L, Ali D, Lincoln A. Measurement properties of a self-report index of ergonomic exposures for use in an office work environment. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44(1):73-81.
10. Li G, Buckle P. Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods. Ergonomics. 1999;42(5):674-695.
11. Karhu O, Kansi P, Kuorinka I. Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analy-sis. Appl Ergon. 1977;8(4):199-201.
12. Ahonen M, Launis M, Kuorinka T. Työterveyslaitos (Finland). Ergonomic Workplace Analysis. Ergo-nomics Section Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1989.
13. Keyserling WM, Brouwer M, Silverstein BA. A checklist for evaluating ergonomic risk factors result-ing from awkward postures of the legs, trunk and neck. Int J Ind Ergon. 1992;9(4):283-301.
14. McAtamney L, Nigel Corlett E. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon. 1993;24(2):91-99.
15. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Fine LJ. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics. 1993;36(7):749-776.
16. Kemmlert K. A method assigned for the identification of ergonomic hazards – PLIBEL. Appl Ergon. 1995;26(3):199-211.
17. Moore JS, Garg A. The Strain Index: a proposed method to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper ex-tremity disorders. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1995;56(5):443-458.
18. Occhipinti E. OCRA: a concise index for the assessment of exposure to repetitive movements of the upper limbs. Ergonomics. 1998;41(9):1290-1311.
19. Neumann P, Wells RP, Norman RW. 4D WATBAK: Adapting Research Tools and Epidemiological Findings to Software for Easy Application by Industrial Personnel. January 1999.
20. Hignett S, McAtamney L. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl Ergon. 2000;31(2):201-205.
21. Kee D, Karwowski W. LUBA: an assessment technique for postural loading on the upper body based on joint motion discomfort and maximum holding time. Appl Ergon. 2001;32(4):357-366.
22. Roman-Liu D. Upper limb load as a function of repetitive task parameters: part 1–a model of upper limb load. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2005;11(1):93-102.
23. David G, Woods V, Li G, Buckle P. The development of the Quick Exposure Check (QEC) for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Appl Ergon. 2008;39(1):57-69.
24. Ferreira J, Gray M, Stanley L, Riley D. Development of an assessment tool for Repetitive Tasks of the Upper Limbs. InContemporary Ergonomics 2008: Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Ergonomics (CE2008), 1-3 April 2008, Nottingham, UK 2017; (p. 459). CRC Press.
25. Kong YK, Han JG, Kim DM. Development of an ergonomic checklist for the investigation of work-related lower limb disorders in farming-ALLA: Agricultural lower-limb assessment. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea. 2010;29(6):933-42.
26. Kong YK, Han JG, Kim DM. Development of an ergonomic checklist for the investigation of work-related lower limb disorders in farming-ALLA: Agricultural lower-limb assessment. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea. 2010;29(6):933-42.
27. Douwes M, de Kraker H. HARM overview and its application: some practical examples. Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:4004-4009. Doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0700-4004
28. Sanchez-Lite A, Garcia M, Domingo R, Angel Sebastian M. Novel ergonomic postural assessment method (NERPA) using product-process computer aided engineering for ergonomic workplace de-sign. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e72703. Published 2013 Aug 16.
29. Kong YK, Lee SJ, Lee KS, Kim GR, Kim DM. Development of an Ergonomics Checklist for Investigation of Work-Related Whole-Body Disorders in Farming - AWBA: Agricultural Whole-Body Assessment. J Agric Saf Health. 2015;21(4):207-215.
30. Chander DS, Cavatorta MP. An observational method for postural ergonomic risk assessment (PERA). Int J Ind Ergon. 2017;57:32-41.
31. Kee D, Na S, Chung MK. Comparison of the Ovako working posture analysis system, rapid upper limb assessment, and rapid entire body assessment based on the maximum holding times. Int J Ind Ergon. 2020;77:102943.
32. Kee D. An empirical comparison of OWAS, RULA and REBA based on self-reported discomfort. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020;26(2):285-295. Doi: 10.1080/10803548.2019.1710933
33. Choi KH, Kim DM, Cho MU, et al. Application of AULA Risk Assessment Tool by Comparison with Other Ergonomic Risk Assessment Tools. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6479.
34. Kong YK, Lee SY, Lee KS, Kim DM. Comparisons of ergonomic evaluation tools (ALLA, RULA, REBA and OWAS) for farm work. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018;24(2):218-223.
35. Enez K, Nalbantoğlu SS. Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment outputs from OWAS and REBA in forestry timber harvesting. Int J Ind Ergon. 2019;70:51-7.
36. Micheletti Cremasco M, Giustetto A, Caffaro F, Colantoni A, Cavallo E, Grigolato S. Risk Assessment for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Forestry: A Comparison between RULA and REBA in the Manual Feed-ing of a Wood-Chipper. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5):793.
37. Zare M, Biau S, Brunet R, Roquelaure Y. Comparison of three methods for evaluation of work postures in a truck assembly plant. Ergonomics. 2017;60(11):1551-1563.
38. Chiasson MÈ, Imbeau D, Aubry K, Delisle A. Comparing the results of eight methods used to evaluate risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Ind Ergon. 2012;42(5):478-88.
39. Joshi M, Deshpande V. A systematic review of comparative studies on ergonomic assessment tech-niques. Int J Ind Ergon. 2019 Nov 1;74:102865.
40. Kee D. Systematic comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA based on a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(1):595.
41. Varghese A, Panicker VV. Computer-aided ergonomic analysis for rubber tapping workers. In Ad-vanced Manufacturing Systems and Innovative Product Design: Select Proceedings of IPDIMS 2020, 2021:57-67.
42. Pramchoo, Walaiporn, Alan F. Geater, and Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich. 2020. “Physical Ergonomic Risk Factors of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome among Rubber Tappers. Archives of Environmental & Occu-pational Health. 75 (1): 1–9. Doi:10.1080/19338244.2018.1507991.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All Journal's articles are Open Access papers distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
