Breast asymmetries: Classification and systematic review

Breast asymmetries: Classification and systematic review

Authors

  • Pietro Susini Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience – University of Siena – Italy
  • Anastasia Fidanza Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery - Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
  • Luca Grimaldi Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience – University of Siena – Italy
  • Giuseppe Nisi Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience – University of Siena – Italy
  • Roberto Cuomo Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience – University of Siena – Italy
  • Mattia Brogi Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery - Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
  • Giulio Menichini Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery - Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
  • Luca Delcroix Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery - Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
  • Aurelio Portincasa Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Foggia Medical School, University of Foggia, via Pinto, Foggia, Italy
  • Alessandro Innocenti Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery - Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

Keywords:

Breast asymmetry AND surgery; breast asymmetry AND classification; breast shape asymmetry; nipple areola asymmetry; acquired breast asymmetry; congenital breast asymmetry.

Abstract

Background and aim: Several classification systems have been proposed for breast asymmetries (BAs) considering volume, shape, position, nipple-areola complex and inframammary fold. In addition, breast consistency should be considered as an additional topic. The latter, although poorly investigated, depends on the adipo-glandular ratio of each breast. Since fat and gland undergo different changes in response to specific stimuli, breasts with different consistency can behave differently over time, even in the same subject, potentially leading to asymmetry. The present review aims to propose a comprehensive classification system of BAs, including the minor forms, taking into account, among the common clinical features, the preoperative consistence of breast tissue.

Methods: A PRISMA systematic review was carried out on the PubMed library from June 2004 to June 2024 searching for studies on BAs original classifications and management strategies.

Results: Thirty-six articles and 3979 patients were included. Specifically, 26 papers on BAs management strategies and 10 articles on BAs original classifications.

Conclusions: BAs of the NAC, the IMF and the breast cone can be distinguished into idiopathic or secondary and following quantitative (volume and projection) and qualitative parameters (shape, position and consistency). Consistency is particularly relevant for surgical stability of the results over time. Therefore, the preoperative evaluation should not be limited to a simple visual inspection but requires a careful palpatory comparison of each breast in order to assess any qualitative BAs and plan the appropriate strategy, aiming to improve surgical results and their long-term stability. (www.actabiomedica.it)

References

1. Henseler H. Exploring natural breast symmetry in the female plastic surgical patient population. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2023;12:Doc03.

2. Edstrom LE, Robson MC, Wright JK. A method for the evaluation of minor degrees of breast asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;60(5):812-4.

3. Radlauer CB, Bowers DG, Jr. Treatment of severe breast asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;47(4):347-50.

4. Vandenbussche F. Asymmetries of the breast: a classification system. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1984;8(1):27-36.

5. Malata CM, Boot JC, Bradbury ET, Ramli AR, Sharpe DT. Congenital breast asymmetry: subjective and objective assessment. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47(2):95-102.

6. Innocenti A. Sisters But Not Twins: A Critical Appraisal of Long-Term Results in Breast Asymmetry Correction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024.

7. Alex A, Bhandary E, McGuire KP. Anatomy and Physiology of the Breast during Pregnancy and Lactation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1252:3-7.

8. Greendale GA, Sternfeld B, Huang M, Han W, Karvonen-Gutierrez C, Ruppert K, et al. Changes in body composition and weight during the menopause transition. JCI Insight. 2019;4(5).

9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

10. Zawadzki T, Antoszewski B, Kasielska-Trojan A. Is Preoperative Asymmetry a Predictor of Postoperative Asymmetry in Patients Undergoing Breast Reduction? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(5).

11. Wei H, Zhang M, Li Q, et al. Correction of breast asymmetry by autologous fat grafting with the aid of 3D laser-scanning technology. Asian J Surg. 2023;46(1):458-64.

12. Gentile P. Tuberous Breast, Deformities, and Asymmetries: A Retrospective Analysis Comparing Fat Grafting Versus Mastopexy and Breast Implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(5):1683-94.

13. Peterson B, Alajmi H, Ladak A, Samargandi OA. Breast Equalization Augmentation: The Use of Ultrasonic Assisted Liposuction for Correction of Primary Breast Asymmetry with Bilateral Augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022;46(2):667-74.

14. Noisser V, Eigenberger A, Weiherer M, Seitz S, Prantl L, Brebant V. Surgery of congenital breast asymmetry-which objective parameter influences the subjective satisfaction with long-term results. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;305(1):95-102.

15. Andjelkov K, Music N, Mosahebi A, Colic M. Management of Nipple-Areola Deformity. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(4):1407-15.

16. Waltho D, McRae M, Thoma A. Patient-Reported Measurement of Breast Asymmetry Using Archimedes' Principle in Breast Reduction Mammaplasty: A Retrospective Study. Cureus. 2020;12(1):e6536.

17. Patlazhan G, Shkolnaya O, Torubarov I, Gomes M. Our 10 Years' Experience in Breast Asymmetry Correction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(3):706-15.

18. Monton J, Torres A, Gijon M, Chang-Azancot L, Kenig N, Trandafir PC, et al. Use of Symmetry Assessment Methods in the Context of Breast Surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(5):1440-51.

19. Nuzzi LC, Firriolo JM, Pike CM, Cerrato FE, DiVasta AD, Labow BI. The Effect of Surgical Treatment on the Quality of Life of Young Women with Breast Asymmetry: A Longitudinal, Cohort Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(4):400e-8e.

20. Kalaria SS, Henderson J, Moliver CL. Iatrogenic Symmastia: Causes and Suggested Repair Technique. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(8):863-72.

21. Rha EY, Kim JM, Yoo G, Jeong JY, Hwang DK, Kim KJ. Is breast asymmetry caused by volume differences in women with pectus excavatum? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(4):470-4.

22. Rinaldi P, Parapatt GK, Giuliani M, et al. Chest and breast MRI: the added value of a fast imaging for a new diagnostic approach in the planning of augmentation surgery in patients with thoracic asymmetries. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(13):2359-67.

23. Nuzzi LC, Cerrato FE, Webb ML, et al. Psychological impact of breast asymmetry on adolescents: a prospective cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(6):1116-23.

24. Osinga R, Bodmer ES, Link BC, Fritsche E, Haug M, Hug U. [Long-term outcome after surgical treatment of breast asymmetry: analysis of the patient's perspective in 51 cases]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2014;46(6):330-5.

25. Ho Quoc C, Delaporte T, Meruta A, La Marca S, Toussoun G, Delay E. Breast asymmetry and pectus excavatum improvement with fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(6):822-9.

26. Dessy LA, Mazzocchi M, Corrias F, Sorvillo V, Scuderi N. Correction of tuberous breast with small volume asymmetry by using a new adjustable implant. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17(7):977-83.

27. Zayakova Y. Planning augmentation mammaplasty of breast asymmetries. Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2013(2):20-5.

28. Zayakova Y. Correction of breast asymmetries with implants. Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2013(1):12-7.

29. Gore SM, Lamberty BG. PERTHESE implant-identical cohesive-gel sizers in breast augmentation: a prospective report on 200 consecutive cases and implications for treatment of breast asymmetry. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(3):310-8.

30. Chan W, Mathur B, Slade-Sharman D, Ramakrishnan V. Developmental breast asymmetry. Breast J. 2011;17(4):391-8.

31. Liu C, Luan J, Mu L, Ji K. The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):2125-32.

32. Tsai FC, Hsieh MS, Liao CK, Wu ST. Correlation between scoliosis and breast asymmetries in women undergoing augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34(3):374-80.

33. Pozzobon AV, Sabino Neto M, Veiga DF, et al. Magnetic resonance images and linear measurements in the surgical treatment of breast asymmetry. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33(2):196-203.

34. Medard de Chardon V, Balaguer T, Chignon-Sicard B, Ihrai T, Lebreton E. [Constitutional asymmetries in aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, postoperative satisfaction and surgical options]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2009;54(4):340-7.

35. Denoel C, Aguirre MF, Bianco G, et al. Idiopathic scoliosis and breast asymmetry. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(10):1303-8.

36. Stahl S, Dannehl D, Daigeler A, et al. Definitions of Abnormal Breast Size and Asymmetry: A Cohort Study of 400 Women. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(6):2242-52.

37. Li C, Ji K, Xu B, Du X, Luan J, Liu C. Balancing Nipple and Inframammary Fold in Transaxillary Augmentation Mammaplasty with Anatomical Implant: The 'NIMF' Classification and Surgical Algorithm. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(4):1497-506.

38. de Vita R, Buccheri EM, Villanucci A, Ragusa LA. Breast Asymmetry, Classification, and Algorithm of Treatment: Our Experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43(6):1439-50.

39. Innocenti A, Innocenti M, Mori F, Melita D, Ciancio F, Cordova A. Tuberous Breast: Past, Present, and Future: Personal Classification, Treatment, and Surgical Outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80(2):104-8.

40. Ors S. Incidence and Classification of Chest Wall Deformities in Breast Augmentation Patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41(6):1280-90.

41. Yeslev M, Braun SA, Maxwell GP. Asymmetry of Inframammary Folds in Patients Undergoing Augmentation Mammaplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(2):156-66.

42. Yesilada AK, Sevim KZ, Sirvan SS, Karsidag S, Tatlidede HS. Our surgical approach to treatment of congenital, developmental, and acquired breast asymmetries: a review of 30 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37(1):77-87.

43. Costagliola M, Atiyeh B, Rampillon F. Tuberous breast: revised classification and a new hypothesis for its development. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37(5):896-903.

44. Eidlitz-Markus T, Mukamel M, Haimi-Cohen Y, Amir J, Zeharia A. Breast asymmetry during adolescence: physiologic and non-physiologic causes. Isr Med Assoc J. 2010;12(4):203-6.

45. Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, et al. Breast asymmetries: a brief review and our experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006;30(3):309-19.

46. Kayar R, Cilengiroglu OV. Breast Volume Asymmetry Value, Ratio, and Cancer Risk. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2015;9:87-92.

47. Reilley AF. Breast asymmetry: classification and management. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26(5):596-600.

48. Cruz NI. Breast Asymmetry in Women Requesting Plastic Surgery of the Breast. P R Health Sci J. 2018;37(4):230-8.

49. Rancati AO, Nahabedian MY, Angrigiani CH, et al. Symmetry following unilateral two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: Is there an optimal time for managing the contralateral breast? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(10):3700-6.

50. Novakovic M, Lukac M, Kozarski J, et al. Principles of surgical treatment of congenital, developmental and acquired female breast asymmetries. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2010;67(4):313-20.

51. Casanova D, Eraud J, Philandrianos C, Bertrand B, Abellan Lopez M. [Classification of mammary asymmetries and principles of treatment]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2022;67(5-6):335-57.

52. Velanovich V. Ectopic breast tissue, supernumerary breasts, and supernumerary nipples. South Med J. 1995;88(9):903-6.

53. Burdick AE, Thomas KA, Welsh E, Powell J, Elgart GW. Axillary polymastia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(6):1154-6.

54. Somma F, Calzoni C, Arleo S, Chiummariello S. [Polythelia and supernumerary breast. Personal experience and review of the literature]. Ann Ital Chir. 2012;83(2):109-12.

55. Patil LG, Shivanna NH, Benakappa N, Ravindranath H, Bhat R. Congenital amastia. Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80(10):870-1.

56. Kennedy KR, Wang AL. Poland Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(1):72.

57. Mareti E, Vatopoulou A, Spyropoulou GA, Papanastasiou A, Pratilas GC, Liberis A, et al. Breast Disorders in Adolescence: A Review of the Literature. Breast Care (Basel). 2021;16(2):149-55.

58. Pike CM, Firriolo JM, Ontiveros NC, et al. A Nonsurgical Approach to Adolescent Breast Asymmetry Using External Prostheses. J Adolesc Health. 2017;61(2):240-5.

59. Susini P, Nisi G, Pierazzi DM, et al. Advances on Capsular Contracture—Prevention and Management Strategies: A Narrative Review of the Literature. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open. 2023;11(6):e5034.

60. Dafydd H, Roehl KR, Phillips LG, Dancey A, Peart F, Shokrollahi K. Redefining gigantomastia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(2):160-3.

61. Gonzalez-Ulloa M. Correction of hypotrophy of the breast by means of exogenous material. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1960;25:15-26.

62. Dancey A, Khan M, Dawson J, Peart F. Gigantomastia--a classification and review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(5):493-502.

63. Swelstad MR, Swelstad BB, Rao VK, Gutowski KA. Management of gestational gigantomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(4):840-8.

64. Susini P, Marcaccini G, Giardino FR, et al. Selective Capsulotomies and Partial Capsulectomy in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Revision Surgery. Breast J. 2024;2024:9097040.

65. Mallucci P, Branford OA. Design for Natural Breast Augmentation: The ICE Principle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(6):1728-37.

66. Rees TD, Aston SJ. The tuberous breast. Clin Plast Surg. 1976;3(2):339-47.

67. Grolleau JL, Lanfrey E, Lavigne B, Chavoin JP, Costagliola M. Breast base anomalies: treatment strategy for tuberous breasts, minor deformities, and asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(7):2040-8.

68. von Heimburg D, Exner K, Kruft S, Lemperle G. The tuberous breast deformity: classification and treatment. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49(6):339-45.

69. Hoffman S. Symmastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;74(3):450.

70. Pagliara D, Montella RA, Garganese G, et al. Improving Decision-making in Prepectoral Direct-to-implant Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: The Key Role of Flap Thickness Ratio. Clin Breast Cancer. 2023;23(2):e37-e44.

71. Miro A, Isoldi FC, Ferreira LM. Surgical treatment of nipple hypertrophy, nipple-areola symmetrization, and functional preservation - A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(11):4169-79.

72. Brown MH, Semple JL, Neligan PC. Variables affecting symmetry of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(4):846-51.

73. Sanuki J, Fukuma E, Uchida Y. Morphologic study of nipple-areola complex in 600 breasts. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33(3):295-7.

74. Stone K, Wheeler A. A Review of Anatomy, Physiology, and Benign Pathology of the Nipple. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(10):3236-40.

75. Bass CB. Herniated areolar complex. Ann Plast Surg. 1978;1(4):402-6.

76. Nicholson BT, Harvey JA, Cohen MA. Nipple-areolar complex: normal anatomy and benign and malignant processes. Radiographics. 2009;29(2):509-23.

77. Hudson DA. The Role of the Inframammary Fold (IMF) in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Critical Analysis and Surgical Solution. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023.

78. Spear SL, Albino FP, Al-Attar A. Classification and management of the postoperative, high-riding nipple. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(6):1413-21.

79. Schusterman MA. Lowering the inframammary fold. Aesthet Surg J. 2004;24(5):482-5.

80. Crerand CE, Infield AL, Sarwer DB. Psychological considerations in cosmetic breast augmentation. Plast Surg Nurs. 2007;27(3):146-54.

Downloads

Published

28-10-2025

Issue

Section

CLINICAL REVIEWS, BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

How to Cite

1.
Susini P, Fidanza A, Grimaldi L, et al. Breast asymmetries: Classification and systematic review. Acta Biomed. 2025;96(5):16961. doi:10.23750/abm.v96i5.16961