Cultivating collaboration: A scoping review of interprofessional learning readiness among medical and other healthcare students
Keywords:
interprofessional education, students, medical, readiness for interprofessional education, collaborative practice, Scoping review, undergraduate, health professions education, curriculum, health occupations, medical educationAbstract
Background and aim: Interprofessional education is crucial for preparing healthcare professionals for collaborative practice. This scoping review aimed to synthesize available evidence on readiness for interprofessional learning among medical students exposed to interprofessional education during medical school.
Methods: Following the JBI methodology for scoping reviews, we searched six databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and PsycINFO) for studies published between 2017 and 2022. The review process adhered strictly to the JBI guidelines for scoping reviews, including the use of standardized data extraction tools and quality assessment measures. The review process included a consultation phase with key stakeholders. Data were extracted and synthesized using a narrative approach complemented by thematic analysis.
Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Medical students generally demonstrated moderate to high levels of readiness for interprofessional learning, with variability across years of study. Early exposure to interprofessional experiences positively influenced readiness. Diverse educational interventions, particularly those involving simulation and immersive clinical experiences, effectively enhanced interprofessional learning readiness. Cultural and contextual factors significantly impacted interprofessional attitudes and readiness.
Conclusions: This review highlights the importance of integrating interprofessional education experiences throughout medical curricula. The findings suggest that targeted educational interventions can positively influence readiness for interprofessional learning, with potential benefits for future collaborative practice. However, there is a need for more robust, longitudinal studies to strengthen the evidence base and address current limitations in the field.
References
1. Chau M, Arruzza E, Spuur K, Ofori-Manteaw B. From classroom to global impact: how radiography education advances the sustainable development goals. Radiography. 2025 Jan;31(1):224–30. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.11.015
2. World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2025 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-education-collaborative-practice
3. El-Awaisi A, El Hajj MS, Lising D, Schwartz F, Paulenko T. Advancing health literacy through interprofessional education: strategies for collaborative learning and practice. In: Health literacy in medicines use and pharmacy. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2025. p. 265–75. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-824407-4.00019-2
4. Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education. About us - CAIPE - Defining IPE [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2025 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.caipe.org/about-us
5. Glubochenko O. Importance of interprofessional education in medical university. In: International Science Group, editor. XXXI International scientific and practical conference “Methodological aspects of education: achievements and prospects.” Rotterdam, Netherlands; 2024. p. 252.
6. Brasil - Ministério da Educação. Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais (DCNs) do curso de graduação em medicina. Resolução no. 3, de 20 de junho de 2014. Brasília: Brasil; 2014.
7. Parsell G, Bligh J. The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Med Educ. 1999;33(2):95–100. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00298.x
8. Alharbi N, Alenazi N, Althubaiti A, Alkahtani R, Nasser S, Aldriwesh M. Evaluating interprofessional education readiness and perceptions among health professions students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024;15:659–68. doi: 10.2147/amep.s461901
9. Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–6. doi: 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000050
10. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. doi: 10.7326/m18-0850
11. Barros TG, Ferreira FA, Rodrigues MS, et al. Readiness for interprofessional learning among medical students: a scoping review protocol. Acta Biomed. 2024;95(3):e2024111. doi: 10.23750/abm.v95i3.15729
12. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
13. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
14. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
15. Numasawa M, Nawa N, Funakoshi Y, et al. A mixed methods study on the readiness of dental, medical, and nursing students for interprofessional learning. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0255086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255086
16. Conte H, Wihlborg J, Lindström V. Developing new possibilities for interprofessional learning: students’ experience of learning together in the ambulance service. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03251-8
17. Zaher S, Otaki F, Zary N, Al Marzouqi A, Radhakrishnan R. Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines: a pre-post study in the United Arab Emirates. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03571-9
18. Tuirán-Gutiérrez GJ, San-Martín M, Delgado-Bolton R, Bartolomé B, Vivanco L. Improvement of inter-professional collaborative work abilities in Mexican medical and nursing students: a longitudinal study. Front Psychol. 2019;10:5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00005
19. Alruwaili A, Mumenah N, Alharthy N, Othman F. Students’ readiness for and perception of interprofessional learning: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02325-9
20. Berger-Estilita J, Chiang H, Stricker D, Fuchs A, Greif R, McAleer S. Attitudes of medical students towards interprofessional education: a mixed-methods study. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240835
21. Wipfler K, Hoffmann JE, Mitzkat A, Mahler C, Frankenhauser S. Patient safety: development, implementation and evaluation of an interprofessional teaching concept. GMS J Med Educ. 2019;36(2):Doc13. doi: 10.3205/zma001221
22. Berger-Estilita J, Fuchs A, Hahn M, Chiang H, Greif R. Attitudes towards interprofessional education in the medical curriculum: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02176-4
23. Liaw SY, Siau C, Zhou WT, Lau TC. Interprofessional simulation-based education program: a promising approach for changing stereotypes and improving attitudes toward nurse–physician collaboration. Appl Nurs Res. 2014;27(4):258–60. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2014.03.005
24. Maharajan MK, Rajiah K, Khoo SP, Chellappan DK, De Alwis R, Chui HC, et al. Attitudes and readiness of students of healthcare professions towards interprofessional learning. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0168863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168863
25. Quesnelle KM, Bright DR, Salvati LA. Interprofessional education through a telehealth team-based learning exercise focused on pharmacogenomics. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018;10(8):1062–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.05.015
26. Visser CLF, Ket JCF, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA. Perceptions of residents, medical and nursing students about interprofessional education: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative literature. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0909-0
27. Ganotice FA Jr, Mendoza NB, Dizon JIWT, Shen X, Lee JCY, Chan E, et al. Students’ motivation and engagement in interprofessional education: the mediating role of peer relatedness. Med Educ Online. 2024;29(1). doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2430593
28. Sarraf‐Yazdi S, Pisupati A, Goh CK, Ong YT, Toh YR, Goh SPL, et al. A scoping review and theory‐informed conceptual model of professional identity formation in medical education. Med Educ. 2024;58(10):1151–65. doi: 10.1111/medu.15399
29. Jama NA, Nyembezi A, Ngcobo S, Lehmann U. Collaboration between traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners: scoping review. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2024;16(1). doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4430
30. Reeves S, Fletcher S, Barr H, et al. A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39. Med Teach. 2016;38(7):656–68. doi: 10.3109/0142159x.2016.1173663
31. Chávez-Valenzuela P, Kappes M, Sambuceti CE, Díaz-Guio DA. Challenges in the implementation of inter-professional education programs with clinical simulation for health care students: a scoping review. Nurse Educ Today. 2025;146:106548. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106548
32. Stefanidis D, Cook D, Kalantar-Motamedi SM, et al. Society for Simulation in Healthcare guidelines for simulation training. Simul Healthc. 2024;19(1S):S4–22. doi: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000776
33. Wilsher SH, Gibbs A, Reed J, Baker R, Lindqvist S. Patient care, integration and collaboration of physician associates in multiprofessional teams: a mixed methods study. Nurs Open. 2023;10(6):3962–72. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1655
34. El-Awaisi A, Wilby KJ, Wilbur K, El Hajj MS, Awaisu A, Paravattil B. A Middle Eastern journey of integrating interprofessional education into the healthcare curriculum: a SWOC analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0852-5
35. Mahler C, Berger S, Reeves S. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS): a problematic evaluative scale for the interprofessional field. J Interprof Care. 2015;29(4):289–91. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1059652
36. Schmitz CC, Brandt BF. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale: to RIPLS or not to RIPLS? That is only part of the question. J Interprof Care. 2015;29(6):525–6. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1108719
37. Oates M, Davidson M. A critical appraisal of instruments to measure outcomes of interprofessional education. Med Educ. 2015;49(4):386–98. doi: 10.1111/medu.12681
38. Allport G. The nature of prejudice. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 1954.
39. Carpenter J, Dickinson H. Interprofessional education and training. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2016.
40. Khalili H, Orchard C, Laschinger HKS, Farah R. An interprofessional socialization framework for developing an interprofessional identity among health professions students. J Interprof Care. 2013;27(6):448–53. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.804042
41. Pollard KC, Miers ME. From students to professionals: results of a longitudinal study of attitudes to pre-qualifying collaborative learning and working in health and social care in the United Kingdom. J Interprof Care. 2008;22(4):399–416. doi: 10.1080/13561820802190483
42. Bogossian F, New K, George K, et al. The implementation of interprofessional education: a scoping review. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2023;28(1):243–77. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10128-4
43. Benz J, Finch-Guthrie PL. Forming interprofessional teams and clarifying roles. In: Interprofessional evidence-based practice. 1st ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016. p. 16. ISBN: 9781003524632
44. Shakhman LM, Al Omari O, Arulappan J, Wynaden D. Interprofessional education and collaboration: strategies for implementation. Oman Med J. 2020;35(4):e160. doi: 10.5001/omj.2020.83
45. Glubochenko O. Importance of interprofessional education in medical university. In: International Science Group, editor. XXXI International scientific and practical conference “Methodological aspects of education: achievements and prospects.” Rotterdam, Netherlands; 2024. p. 252. doi: 10.23736/S0025-7826.23.04231-X
46. Chávez-Valenzuela P, Kappes M, Sambuceti CE, Díaz-Guio DA. Challenges in the implementation of inter-professional education programs with clinical simulation for health care students: a scoping review. Nurse Educ Today. 2025;146:106548. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12080809
47. Wilsher SH, Gibbs A, Reed J, Baker R, Lindqvist S. Patient care, integration and collaboration of physician associates in multiprofessional teams: a mixed methods study. Nurs Open. 2023;10(6):3962–72. doi: 10.7416/ai.2024.2638
48. Nagel DA, Penner JL, Halas G, Philip MT, Cooke CA. Exploring experiential learning within interprofessional practice education initiatives for pre-licensure healthcare students: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05114-w
49. Paradis E, Whitehead CR. Louder than words: power and conflict in interprofessional education articles, 1954–2013. Med Educ. 2015;49(4):399–407. doi: 10.1111/medu.12668
50. Evans SM, Ward C, Reeves S. Online interprofessional education facilitation: a scoping review. Med Teach. 2019;41(2):215–22. doi: 10.1080/0142159x.2018.1460656
51. Sincak C, Gunn J, Conroy C, et al. Transformation of an online multidisciplinary course into a live interprofessional experience. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017;81(5):94. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81594
52. Vandergoot S, Sarris A, Kirby N, Ward H. Exploring undergraduate students’ attitudes towards interprofessional learning, motivation-to-learn, and perceived impact of learning conflict resolution skills. J Interprof Care. 2018;32(2):211–9. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1383975
53. Homeyer S, Hoffmann W, Hingst P, Oppermann RF, Dreier-Wolfgramm A. Effects of interprofessional education for medical and nursing students: enablers, barriers and expectations for optimizing future interprofessional collaboration – a qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2018;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12912-018-0279-x
54. Pinto C, Possanza A, Karpa K. Examining student perceptions of an inter-institutional interprofessional stroke simulation activity. J Interprof Care. 2018;32(3):391–4. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1405921
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thales Guardia de Barros, João Daniel De Souza Menezes, Matheus Querino da Silva , Emerson Roberto dos Santos , Raquel Sudária da Cruz Marques e Silva , Jessica Rodrigues Roma Uyemura , Isabela Amaral de Almeida Bistafa, Marcos Sanches Rodrigues, Thalissa Catricala, Carlos Dario da Silva Costa , Gustavo Schiavinato, Flávia Cristina Custódio, Janaína Aparecida de Sales Floriano, Stela Regina Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho , Pedro Belchior da Silveira Junior, Gabriela Gouvea Silva, Josimerci Ittavo Lamana Faria, Vânia Maria Sabadoto Brienze, Júlio César André, Patrícia da Silva Fucuta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.